Jacob Jefferson Jakes

GOP Media Warfare, Hierarchy, and Agriculture

A flurry of articles, many from the pages at Salon, have attacked the Republican candidates for their attack on the moderators of the recent CNBC debate, and on the media in general. William Saletan, in Reality Sucks, insists the issue is not a division between the press and the public but between those who listen to evidence and those who are impervious and defiant of it. Saletan maintains that the Republican candidates are merely upset that the moderators are challenging, with evidence, the legitimacy of their policy prescriptions, and they feel wronged. Saletan notes that some reality leaked in when Kasich “debunked his colleague’s tax, budget, and deportation math,” as the moderators themselves were attempting to challenge. If Kasich and the moderators were on the side of evidence, the audience seemed not. Saletan notes that ‘Rubio went ballistic’ when asked about his own personal financial irregularities, exclaiming, “Democrats have the ultimate super PAC.

To the Heart of an Idea, Conservative and Liberal

Several weeks back, a lot of ink was spilled on issues raised when Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis refused to provide marriage licenses because providing them to same-sex couples would make her implicit in their sinfulness. From the liberals came the rights of all individuals to partake in the rites of society; from the conservatives, the right to religious freedom. No matter which side you agree with, most of what appeared in print could properly be called ‘rot’. So many articles preaching to the same choirs, rather than a reasoned attempt to persuade others.

State Sovereignty and Constitutionally-limited Government

As some seem to want to tell it, when the nation was first formed, it was clear that the war could only be prosecuted successfully by a strong central government. Only with significant power of taxation to pay the soldiers fighting for our freedom, and the might to keep the states in line so that there would be a concerted and unified effort against England, could the nation win the war.

After the war, however, many succumbed to the stupor that accompanies a strong central government, preferring safety and comfort to the freedoms they had just fought a war to acquire. A group of brave, patriotic men met in Philadelphia, and with few disagreements and a unified voice, created a Constitution which weakened the central government by placing limitations on its authority. Even though the creators of the Constitution had few disagreements among themselves, it took a concerted effort to convince a population growing lazy that a weaker central government was in their interests. It took the valiant efforts of Jameson, Alexander, and Bird in the Federalist Papers to promote this new vision, and ultimately, it prevailed.

“...of the United States…”: Creating a Nation

Perhaps more important than those thrilling three words which precede it, “We the People”, are the four which follow, “of the United States.” This Constitution is forming a nation. Compare this with “the perpetual union between the states,” which the Articles of Confederation notes. A group of influential men gathered in Philadelphia on May 25, 1787 to open proceedings of the Constitutional Convention, nominating and unanimously agreeing that George Washington would be the convention’s president. Between then and September 15, when the Constitution was put to a final, unanimous roll call of states, and September 17, when the convention came to a close, the founders of the nation put forward, debated, accepted, and rejected many proposals, reaching the compromise that has become our Constitution. On Sept.

I Would Not Throw the Fat Man Off the Bridge and onto the Trolley Tracks

Our whole family sat around the television watching the concluding episode of The Fugitive. We each guessed who we thought had done the murder that the fugitive had spent so long pursuing while avoiding the law. Toward the end of the show, right before the commercial break, one of the characters indicated he had a confession to make. We kids took that immediately to mean that he was the killer. But my parents said not to be so sure. And in fact the confession was just that he had seen who had done the murder and never reported it, not done it himself.

Similarly, there was an episode in The Rifleman where a fellow comes to town who seems like a nice fellow, befriends the rifleman’s son and his friends, and when there was trouble we kids couldn’t imagine this nice guy being the culprit. But our parents saw what we didn’t, either because they knew the character, or they knew how TV shows played out.

Shit Happens and Big Data

When they found the body in the peat, one contingent went off to find Gil Cunningham to handle matters while the other went off to grab the witch they knew was responsible for the death. But Gil Cunningham, hero of a series of novels by Pat McIntosh, is a bit more modern than the 15th century in which the tales are set. He makes an examination, releases the witch, takes the body back to the manor for a closer inspection, and undertakes a larger investigation.

Wittgenstein, Identity-Protection Cognition, and Understanding Rather than Persuading

Ludwig Wittgenstein spent the first part of his career attempting to provide a definitive foundation for logic, meaning, and language. This work was best represented by Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, written with Bertrand Russell. In it they attempt to give mathematical precision to human experience. Wittgenstein was altered by his experiences in World War I, in which he served for Austria-Hungary. He spend the second part of his career refuting his earlier work, culminating in Philosophical Investigations. In Philosophy Weekend: Thinking Like Wittgenstein, Levi Asher thinks this a nifty trick, and lauds Wittgenstein for embracing “the ultimate incomprehensibility of existence itself.”

What if Piketty is Right?

Capitalism and democracy are incompatible.

Katerina once told me that democracy is a deception that the powerful offer to trick people into believing they have a voice in their government. She was a left-wing student of mine when I was teaching high school in Greece almost 40 years ago, and I have always remembered not only her words, but the matter-of-fact way she expressed them.

Edmund Burke, Anita Hill, and the Common Core

Anita Hill is in the news again. A documentary has been released of her life before, during, and after her 1991 congressional testimony during the hearings on Clarence Thomas’ appointment to the Supreme Court. Our conversation has changed over the past 23 years since Anita Hill leveled charges of sexual harassment against Clarence Thomas on national TV. There are more laws targeting sexual harassment in the workplace, and companies are providing more training to avoid sexual harassment. But change comes slowly, as we know from recent incidents in the military and the academies, and continuing streams of accusations elsewhere.

Adrionna Harris and the Ajax Dilemma

Adrionna Harris, a sixth-grade student, came across a student at her school who was cutting his arm. She intervened, took the razor from the student and threw it away, then reported the incident to school authorities. For which action she was suspended and recommended for expulsion for violating the school’s zero tolerance policy on having weapons at school (a decision since reconsidered in the wake of the reaction against it).


Subscribe to The Political Mind RSS