The Political Mind
The science and psychology of politics
Navigation
  • About
  • Mind&Politics
  • G Scott Blakley
  • I. A. Grea
You are here: Home › Commentary › US Federal Spending
← Taxes, Income, and Wealth
Nate Silver, Political Intuitionist →

US Federal Spending

November 2, 2011 | Filed under: Commentary and tagged with: defense spending, discretionary spending, mandatory spending, social security, spending cuts

U.S. Federal Spending in Fiscal Year 2010 was $3,456 B.

  • 20% to Defense
  • 20% to Social Security
  • 23% to Medicare and Medicaid
  • 6% to Interest on the Debt
  • 12% for Other Mandatory
  • 19% for Discretionary

U.S. Federal Tax Receipts for Fiscal Year 2010 were $2,162 B.

That covers about 60% of spending.

  • 42% from individual income
  • 40% from Social Security
  • 9% from Corporate Income
  • 3% from Excise
  • 6% from Other

Assuming that we don’t want to cut defense, social security, or Medicare, and don’t want to declare bankruptcy by not paying interest on our debt, 69% of our spending is generally non-controversial. In addition, I’ll assume that paying Veterans’ pensions and healthcare, federal employee retirement, , transportation, including FAA and air traffic control, and spending on our National Parks is also non-controversial. They add 10.5%, leaving us with about 80% of our budget as non-controversial. We’ll leave off, even though they might be generally agreed upon, things like Unemployment, other healthcare, space/science, and agriculture. (For more, here.)

We are now paying taxes to cover 60% of spending, but generally agree we want to maintain 80% of the budget.

We are currently paying taxes at the rate of 15% of GDP, which is the lowest since 1950. To cover 80% of the budget, we would have to raise taxes now to 20% of GDP, which is about where they were in 1981 (19.6%) and 1998-2001 (roughly 20%).

Of course, growth out of the current recession is expected to raise the percentage of GDP we will be paying in taxes in the next five years to 17%, then 18%, then 19% (chart).

Which still leaves us 20% of government to fight over and pay for or cut.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Tweet

Written by Jacob Jefferson Jakes

← Taxes, Income, and Wealth
Nate Silver, Political Intuitionist →

RSS Jonathan Haidt

  • Why The Righteous Mind may be the best common reading for incoming college students February 19, 2017 Jonathan Haidt

RSS George Lakoff

RSS Corey Robin

Jacob Jefferson Jakes

The Political Mind

  • View Jacob-Jefferson-Jakes-127488407357719’s profile on Facebook
  • View JacobJJakes’s profile on Twitter
  • View 118350928673473455810’s profile on Google+

Mind&Politics

  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Facebook
  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Twitter
  • View 107647165319384338834’s profile on Google+

Recent Posts

  • The Truth Behind the Curtain: Ken Ham, Antonin Scalia, and Milton Friedman find it February 20, 2017
  • “I Support Trump” July 31, 2016
  • GOP Media Warfare, Hierarchy, and Agriculture November 28, 2015
  • To the Heart of an Idea, Conservative and Liberal October 25, 2015
  • State Sovereignty and Constitutionally-limited Government September 7, 2015
  • “…of the United States…”: Creating a Nation July 27, 2014
  • I Would Not Throw the Fat Man Off the Bridge and onto the Trolley Tracks July 13, 2014
  • Shit Happens and Big Data July 12, 2014
  • Wittgenstein, Identity-Protection Cognition, and Understanding Rather than Persuading June 1, 2014
  • What if Piketty is Right? April 27, 2014

Recent Comments

    Archives

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Categories

    Tags

    1% abortion Adam Smith anti-federalist Articles of Confederation Avi Tuschman climate change conservatism conservative conservative boredom constitution David Brooks democracy Edmund Burke Elvin Lim federalist federal taxes gay rights George Lakoff hobby lobby income inequality Jonathan Haidt karma liberal liberal mind libertarians Mitt Romney moral politics natural law neoconservatives Newt GIngrich nurturant parent Occupy Wall Street Patrick Allitt pro-life racism robert reich strict father strict father model tax policy tax quintiles Tea Party The Lovers Quarrel Thomas Pangle virtue of muddling through

    © 2025 The Political Mind

    Powered by Esplanade Theme by One Designs and WordPress