The Political Mind
The science and psychology of politics
Navigation
  • About
  • Mind&Politics
  • G Scott Blakley
  • I. A. Grea
You are here: Home › Commentary › Social Media: Strict Father and Nurturant Parent Educators
← Bad Analogy: Abandoning Our Friends
North Korea, Juche, and Conservatives →

Social Media: Strict Father and Nurturant Parent Educators

December 18, 2011 | Filed under: Commentary and tagged with: nurturant parent, social media issues, strict father

Today’s New York Times (Sunday 18 Dec 2011) has an article on Rules to Stop Pupil and Teacher From Getting Too Social Online. School boards and state legislatures, in reponse to inappropriate communications between students and teachers using social media, are attempting to establish and enforce stricter guidelines on how students and teachers interact.

While everyone quoted is of course concerned about how social media use can lead to inappropriate interactions, those quoted who would resist guidelines which are too strict tend to see social media as a tool for expanding education outside of the classroom. One mentioned that using social media for communication “works”, since it is a major means by which students communicate these days. Another saw it as an extension of the classroom, and saw benefits in modeling “best practices on social media use.”

But in the background I hear echoes of the moral debate that George Lakoff uncovers in the political sphere. For a strict father practitioner in the education realm, education is about a central figure of authority imparting the required knowledge to subordinate students, and the best way to do this is the traditional way, standing in front of a classroom. Those students who can succeed in this normal environment will succeed in life; the rest won’t.

Those resisting the stricter guidelines have all the hallmark of nurturant parent educators, working side-by-side with students helping guide them along the path. And if it means taking up the means by which students today communicate, all the better.

Verdict: there is a lot more going on to this debate beneath the surface than this article gets at.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Tweet

Written by Jacob Jefferson Jakes

← Bad Analogy: Abandoning Our Friends
North Korea, Juche, and Conservatives →

RSS Jonathan Haidt

  • Why The Righteous Mind may be the best common reading for incoming college students February 19, 2017 Jonathan Haidt

RSS George Lakoff

RSS Corey Robin

Jacob Jefferson Jakes

The Political Mind

  • View Jacob-Jefferson-Jakes-127488407357719’s profile on Facebook
  • View JacobJJakes’s profile on Twitter
  • View 118350928673473455810’s profile on Google+

Mind&Politics

  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Facebook
  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Twitter
  • View 107647165319384338834’s profile on Google+

Recent Posts

  • The Truth Behind the Curtain: Ken Ham, Antonin Scalia, and Milton Friedman find it February 20, 2017
  • “I Support Trump” July 31, 2016
  • GOP Media Warfare, Hierarchy, and Agriculture November 28, 2015
  • To the Heart of an Idea, Conservative and Liberal October 25, 2015
  • State Sovereignty and Constitutionally-limited Government September 7, 2015
  • “…of the United States…”: Creating a Nation July 27, 2014
  • I Would Not Throw the Fat Man Off the Bridge and onto the Trolley Tracks July 13, 2014
  • Shit Happens and Big Data July 12, 2014
  • Wittgenstein, Identity-Protection Cognition, and Understanding Rather than Persuading June 1, 2014
  • What if Piketty is Right? April 27, 2014

Recent Comments

    Archives

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Categories

    Tags

    1% abortion ACA anti-federalist Avi Tuschman climate change conservatism conservative conservative boredom conservative enthusiasm conservative mind constitution critical thinking Daniel Kahneman David Brooks democracy Edmund Burke federalist federal taxes gay rights George Lakoff hobby lobby income inequality Jonathan Haidt Joshua Greene karma liberal liberal mind moral politics Moral Tribes natural law Newt GIngrich nurturant parent Occupy Wall Street Patrick Allitt racism Steven Pinker strict father strict father model tax policy tax quintiles Tea Party The Lovers Quarrel Thomas Pangle virtue of muddling through

    © 2025 The Political Mind

    Powered by Esplanade Theme by One Designs and WordPress