The Political Mind
The science and psychology of politics
Navigation
  • About
  • Mind&Politics
  • G Scott Blakley
  • I. A. Grea
You are here: Home › Commentary › One Mind, One Community
← Secular Humanism, The Enemy
What is Conservatism? Take One →

One Mind, One Community

March 5, 2012 | Filed under: Commentary and tagged with: co-evolution of culture and human species, division of knowledge, Joe Henrich, No Child Left Behind

Joe Henrich gave an interesting talk at the 2009 Emory University Center for Mind, Brain, and Culture Symposium on The Evolution of Brain, Mind and Culture. Professor Henrich studies the co-evolution of culture and the human species (I found the podcast on iTunes.)

One point in his talk particularly gave me cause to ponder. In Prof. Henrich’s thesis, society evolved, humans became more sociable, they shared more information, and grew bigger brains to hold all that new information. The information became too much for single brains to hold, so we had the first division of knowledge, that held by the female brain, and that held by the male brain (with lots of overlapping, of course). As societies became more complex, different trades appeared, and society was able to retain even more knowledge, because those of one trade could keep knowledge related to their trade, and other tradesmen knowledge related to their trades.

I thought about how this might apply to current trends in education. The No Child Left Behind Act sought to bring accountability to education, and one of the main ways to bring this about was through standardized testing. Standardization means that to a large degree, everyone learns the same thing, so they can be compared against each other, we can tell which teachers and programs are effective, and we can maintain accountability.

But this standardization is contrary to the development which Prof. Henrich notes is part of the evolution of societies he studies. If we all learn the same things, collectively we know less than if different individuals or groups of individuals learn different things. Standardization of testing leads to standardization of teaching, and of learning, and leads to a dumbing down of the overall society. This cannot be beneficial to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Tweet

Written by Jacob Jefferson Jakes

← Secular Humanism, The Enemy
What is Conservatism? Take One →

RSS Jonathan Haidt

  • Why The Righteous Mind may be the best common reading for incoming college students February 19, 2017 Jonathan Haidt

RSS George Lakoff

RSS Corey Robin

Jacob Jefferson Jakes

The Political Mind

  • View Jacob-Jefferson-Jakes-127488407357719’s profile on Facebook
  • View JacobJJakes’s profile on Twitter
  • View 118350928673473455810’s profile on Google+

Mind&Politics

  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Facebook
  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Twitter
  • View 107647165319384338834’s profile on Google+

Recent Posts

  • The Truth Behind the Curtain: Ken Ham, Antonin Scalia, and Milton Friedman find it February 20, 2017
  • “I Support Trump” July 31, 2016
  • GOP Media Warfare, Hierarchy, and Agriculture November 28, 2015
  • To the Heart of an Idea, Conservative and Liberal October 25, 2015
  • State Sovereignty and Constitutionally-limited Government September 7, 2015
  • “…of the United States…”: Creating a Nation July 27, 2014
  • I Would Not Throw the Fat Man Off the Bridge and onto the Trolley Tracks July 13, 2014
  • Shit Happens and Big Data July 12, 2014
  • Wittgenstein, Identity-Protection Cognition, and Understanding Rather than Persuading June 1, 2014
  • What if Piketty is Right? April 27, 2014

Recent Comments

    Archives

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Categories

    Tags

    1% abortion ACA anti-federalist Avi Tuschman climate change conservatism conservative conservative boredom conservative enthusiasm conservative mind constitution critical thinking Daniel Kahneman David Brooks democracy Edmund Burke federalist federal taxes gay rights George Lakoff hobby lobby income inequality Jonathan Haidt Joshua Greene karma liberal liberal mind moral politics Moral Tribes natural law Newt GIngrich nurturant parent Occupy Wall Street Patrick Allitt racism Steven Pinker strict father strict father model tax policy tax quintiles Tea Party The Lovers Quarrel Thomas Pangle virtue of muddling through

    © 2025 The Political Mind

    Powered by Esplanade Theme by One Designs and WordPress