The Political Mind
The science and psychology of politics
Navigation
  • About
  • Mind&Politics
  • G Scott Blakley
  • I. A. Grea
You are here: Home › Commentary › Society on a Slippery Slope
← Conservatism in Three Dimensions
Austrian Economics: Scholasticism, Calvinism, and an Arbitrary God →

Society on a Slippery Slope

May 14, 2012 | Filed under: Commentary and tagged with: broccoli, health care, slippery slope, supreme court

Adam Smith describes society, both economic and social/moral, as developing from webs of human interactions. We build our societies from the bottom up by virtue of our unscripted person-to-person interactions. Natural law, on the other hand, defines society in a more top-down fashion. Society does, and should, follow the dictates of a natural law which stands outside of the members of the society.

Richard Thaler, in Slippery-Slope Logic, Applied to Health Care, in Sunday’s New York Times, lambastes slippery-slope logic in general, and how it was applied to the health care debate in particular by the justices of the Supreme Court. Referring to Justice Scalia’s remark that, “Therefore, you can make people buy broccoli,” Thaler notes, “The irony is that Justices Roberts and Scalia are warning of a risk that they and their colleagues have the power to prevent.”

My guess is that just as the natural law is regarded as an outside force that does and should guide how we construct our society, so frequent citation of the slippery slope in argumentation is based on a sense that there is an outside force which does and will govern how our lives unfold. Thaler’s reference to the power of the justices to guide society is a counterbalance to that. We, the citizens of the society, in our myriad interactions with each other, form our society and guide our lives.

This notion of a slippery slope which Thaler rejects fits in well with my previous attempts at a taxonomy of the political mind. As we go about designing and directing our society, who’s advice do we take, that of the wise persons who have gone on before us and whose wisdom has stood the test of time; or ourselves and our neighbors, who are in the midst of this life and society, and should best know its features and our desires?

Congress will not pass a law which requires the eating of broccoli; and if they did, in the reverse of Prohibition, people would refuse to eat it anyway. Maybe that’s the natural law; or maybe it’s just that humans have some sense, and some ability to regulate themselves.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Tweet

Written by Jacob Jefferson Jakes

← Conservatism in Three Dimensions
Austrian Economics: Scholasticism, Calvinism, and an Arbitrary God →

RSS Jonathan Haidt

  • Why The Righteous Mind may be the best common reading for incoming college students February 19, 2017 Jonathan Haidt

RSS George Lakoff

RSS Corey Robin

Jacob Jefferson Jakes

The Political Mind

  • View Jacob-Jefferson-Jakes-127488407357719’s profile on Facebook
  • View JacobJJakes’s profile on Twitter
  • View 118350928673473455810’s profile on Google+

Mind&Politics

  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Facebook
  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Twitter
  • View 107647165319384338834’s profile on Google+

Recent Posts

  • The Truth Behind the Curtain: Ken Ham, Antonin Scalia, and Milton Friedman find it February 20, 2017
  • “I Support Trump” July 31, 2016
  • GOP Media Warfare, Hierarchy, and Agriculture November 28, 2015
  • To the Heart of an Idea, Conservative and Liberal October 25, 2015
  • State Sovereignty and Constitutionally-limited Government September 7, 2015
  • “…of the United States…”: Creating a Nation July 27, 2014
  • I Would Not Throw the Fat Man Off the Bridge and onto the Trolley Tracks July 13, 2014
  • Shit Happens and Big Data July 12, 2014
  • Wittgenstein, Identity-Protection Cognition, and Understanding Rather than Persuading June 1, 2014
  • What if Piketty is Right? April 27, 2014

Recent Comments

    Archives

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Categories

    Tags

    1% abortion Adam Smith anti-federalist Articles of Confederation Avi Tuschman climate change conservatism conservative conservative boredom constitution David Brooks democracy Edmund Burke Elvin Lim federalist federal taxes gay rights George Lakoff hobby lobby income inequality Jonathan Haidt karma liberal liberal mind libertarians Mitt Romney moral politics natural law neoconservatives Newt GIngrich nurturant parent Occupy Wall Street Patrick Allitt pro-life racism robert reich strict father strict father model tax policy tax quintiles Tea Party The Lovers Quarrel Thomas Pangle virtue of muddling through

    © 2025 The Political Mind

    Powered by Esplanade Theme by One Designs and WordPress