The Political Mind
The science and psychology of politics
Navigation
  • About
  • Mind&Politics
  • G Scott Blakley
  • I. A. Grea
You are here: Home › Commentary › Adrionna Harris and the Ajax Dilemma
← Our Heroes From the Past Have Let Us Down
Edmund Burke, Anita Hill, and the Common Core →

Adrionna Harris and the Ajax Dilemma

March 23, 2014 | Filed under: Commentary and tagged with: Adrionna Harris, Ajax, fairness, justice, leadership, Paul Woodruff, The Ajax Dilemma

Adrionna Harris, a sixth-grade student, came across a student at her school who was cutting his arm. She intervened, took the razor from the student and threw it away, then reported the incident to school authorities. For which action she was suspended and recommended for expulsion for violating the school’s zero tolerance policy on having weapons at school (a decision since reconsidered in the wake of the reaction against it).

Ajax was a Greek hero in the Trojan War. When Achilles dies, his armor is to be given to the worthiest soldier. Ajax, loyal and hard-working, behind whose broad shoulders many soldiers gathered during the battles, believes he deserves the armor. Odysseus, wily and articulate, is his rival for the armor. Agamemnon, the king, in an attempt to be just and fair and create a decision about which there can be no reproach, has a panel of soldiers decide; they choose Odysseus. Ajax explodes in anger, attempts to kill the king, and commits suicide. Paul Woodruff muses on the situation in The Ajax Dilemma: Justice, Fairness, and Rewards. Even more than the title implies, he talks about leadership. Life is messy, particularly when human beings are involved, and a leader can never be sure what the right response must be. Good leaders have a knack for understanding their subjects; they take charge and know how to respond. But Agamemnon is not a good leader, and his attempts at an institutional decision via the panel of soldiers backfires.

The school’s rules subjected Adrionna Harris to punishment for transgressing them. The school administrators were remiss in their duties; rather than lead, they let the institution and its rules dictate the outcome. They hid behind the legalities of the rules rather than being the leaders they are tasked with being. And instead of justice and fairness, they sowed discord by improperly punishing an individual who was, instead, worthy of praise and adulation.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Tweet

Written by Jacob Jefferson Jakes

← Our Heroes From the Past Have Let Us Down
Edmund Burke, Anita Hill, and the Common Core →

RSS Jonathan Haidt

  • Why The Righteous Mind may be the best common reading for incoming college students February 19, 2017 Jonathan Haidt

RSS George Lakoff

RSS Corey Robin

Jacob Jefferson Jakes

The Political Mind

  • View Jacob-Jefferson-Jakes-127488407357719’s profile on Facebook
  • View JacobJJakes’s profile on Twitter
  • View 118350928673473455810’s profile on Google+

Mind&Politics

  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Facebook
  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Twitter
  • View 107647165319384338834’s profile on Google+

Recent Posts

  • The Truth Behind the Curtain: Ken Ham, Antonin Scalia, and Milton Friedman find it February 20, 2017
  • “I Support Trump” July 31, 2016
  • GOP Media Warfare, Hierarchy, and Agriculture November 28, 2015
  • To the Heart of an Idea, Conservative and Liberal October 25, 2015
  • State Sovereignty and Constitutionally-limited Government September 7, 2015
  • “…of the United States…”: Creating a Nation July 27, 2014
  • I Would Not Throw the Fat Man Off the Bridge and onto the Trolley Tracks July 13, 2014
  • Shit Happens and Big Data July 12, 2014
  • Wittgenstein, Identity-Protection Cognition, and Understanding Rather than Persuading June 1, 2014
  • What if Piketty is Right? April 27, 2014

Recent Comments

    Archives

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Categories

    Tags

    1% abortion ACA Adam Smith anti-federalist Articles of Confederation Avi Tuschman conservatism conservative enthusiasm conservative mind constitution critical thinking Daniel Kahneman David Brooks democracy Edmund Burke Elvin Lim federalist federal taxes George Lakoff hobby lobby income inequality Jonathan Haidt Joshua Greene karma liberal mind libertarians Mitt Romney moral politics Moral Tribes natural law neoconservatives Newt GIngrich Occupy Wall Street Patrick Allitt pro-life racism robert reich Steven Pinker strict father strict father model tax policy Tea Party The Lovers Quarrel Thomas Pangle

    © 2025 The Political Mind

    Powered by Esplanade Theme by One Designs and WordPress