The Political Mind
The science and psychology of politics
Navigation
  • About
  • Mind&Politics
  • G Scott Blakley
  • I. A. Grea
You are here: Home › Commentary › Hobbes, Conservatism, and Freedom
← Medieval Mysteries… and the Deserving
Conservatism, Competitive and Reactive →

Hobbes, Conservatism, and Freedom

January 4, 2012 | Filed under: Commentary and tagged with: economic freedom, freedom of thought, personal freedom, Thomas Hobbes Leviathan

In The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin, Corey Robin illuminates Thomas Hobbes’ views on freedom. Hobbes counters the notion that freedom means being subject to one’s own will and servitude to the will of another; and that being subject to laws of a republic or democracy, laws that flow from one’s participation in government, is on par with being subject to one’s own will, while being subject to the king’s will is servitude. Hobbes separates personal liberty from the state of public affairs. Freedom, then, is “liberty to buy, and sell, and otherwise contract with one another; to choose their own aboad, their own diet, their own trade of life, and institute their children as they themselves think fit; & the like.”  (Hobbes, Leviathan). This can more readily happen when a sovereign can guarantee freedom of movement than under a republic or democracy.

This notion of freedom as personal freedom, economic freedom to a large degree, corresponds quite closely to George Lakoff’s description of the strict father model of morality which he believes underlies conservatism. This model believes in hierarchy, in a dominant figure, and in the right of those who have proven themselves responsible to go about their business without interference.

It corresponds quite closely, as well, to much of today’s American conservative belief and commentary, the insistance that freedom is, to a large degree, economic freedom, where individuals, think small businesses, should be allowed to go about their business with as little governmental interference as possible. Like Hobbes, freedom is not so much democracy and freedom of thought as it is a personal, and economic, freedom. Conservatives want strong government which protects us from our enemies so that we can go about our day-to-day lives without interference.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Tweet

Written by Jacob Jefferson Jakes

← Medieval Mysteries… and the Deserving
Conservatism, Competitive and Reactive →

RSS Jonathan Haidt

  • Why The Righteous Mind may be the best common reading for incoming college students February 19, 2017 Jonathan Haidt

RSS George Lakoff

RSS Corey Robin

Jacob Jefferson Jakes

The Political Mind

  • View Jacob-Jefferson-Jakes-127488407357719’s profile on Facebook
  • View JacobJJakes’s profile on Twitter
  • View 118350928673473455810’s profile on Google+

Mind&Politics

  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Facebook
  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Twitter
  • View 107647165319384338834’s profile on Google+

Recent Posts

  • The Truth Behind the Curtain: Ken Ham, Antonin Scalia, and Milton Friedman find it February 20, 2017
  • “I Support Trump” July 31, 2016
  • GOP Media Warfare, Hierarchy, and Agriculture November 28, 2015
  • To the Heart of an Idea, Conservative and Liberal October 25, 2015
  • State Sovereignty and Constitutionally-limited Government September 7, 2015
  • “…of the United States…”: Creating a Nation July 27, 2014
  • I Would Not Throw the Fat Man Off the Bridge and onto the Trolley Tracks July 13, 2014
  • Shit Happens and Big Data July 12, 2014
  • Wittgenstein, Identity-Protection Cognition, and Understanding Rather than Persuading June 1, 2014
  • What if Piketty is Right? April 27, 2014

Recent Comments

    Archives

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Categories

    Tags

    1% abortion Adam Smith anti-federalist Articles of Confederation Avi Tuschman climate change conservatism conservative conservative boredom constitution David Brooks democracy Edmund Burke Elvin Lim federalist federal taxes gay rights George Lakoff hobby lobby income inequality Jonathan Haidt karma liberal liberal mind libertarians Mitt Romney moral politics natural law neoconservatives Newt GIngrich nurturant parent Occupy Wall Street Patrick Allitt pro-life racism robert reich strict father strict father model tax policy tax quintiles Tea Party The Lovers Quarrel Thomas Pangle virtue of muddling through

    © 2025 The Political Mind

    Powered by Esplanade Theme by One Designs and WordPress