The Political Mind
The science and psychology of politics
Navigation
  • About
  • Mind&Politics
  • G Scott Blakley
  • I. A. Grea
You are here: Home › Commentary › Introverts and Presidential Candidates
← Conservatives in the Third Dimension
Harry Perkins and the Rest of Us →

Introverts and Presidential Candidates

February 11, 2012 | Filed under: Commentary and tagged with: culture of character, culture of personality, David Brooks, extroverts, introverts, Mitt Romney, Susan Cain

I picked up Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can’t Stop Talking, by Susan Cain, not because it would have any bearing on writing Mind&Politics, but simply because I’m an introvert and thought it would be interesting. She writes that sometime around the beginning of the 1900’s, we went from being a “culture of character” to a “culture of personality”. A culture of character concentrates on guiding individuals to higher moral values and becoming better citizens; a culture of personality guides individuals to participate in society and interact successfully with their fellow citizens.

Then, in this past week’s article on The Crowd Pleaser, David Brooks, to a degree, brings Susan Cain’s introversion/extroversion thesis into the political sphere. Writing about Mitt Romney and why he is having trouble sealing the deal with Republicans and conservatives, Brooks calls Romney “other-directed”. Referencing David Riesman’s 1950 The Lonely Crowd, about how different eras nurture different personality types, Brooks indicates that the service or information age economy favors the other-directed personality.

Cain uses Dale Carnegie’s quest to win friends and influence people as a springboard to describing the extrovert personality and its strengths and how it has become favored in today’s world. She describes the culture of personality as focusing on how others perceive you, and links its rise further back than Brooks does to the industrial economy and the move of individuals to the cities, where they had to work, not with neighbors, but with strangers, and had to learn how to navigate in this new social setting. Making favorable impressions on those around you became critical.

Brooks speculates that Romney’s career (rather than in a specific industry like shipping or airlines, it was in “management of management”) leads him, as a politician, to think of himself as the product that he is selling. This product changes as his target market changes; in other words, he has learned the lessons on how to read the group he is presenting himself to and tailoring his personality and his message to appeal to and influence that group.

But, “this is a bad moment,” Brooks writes, for a politician “to be coming across as an other-directed person.” In our “spiritual anxiety,” in our “period of fragmentation,” we are looking for leadership which is rooted and resolute.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Tweet

Written by Jacob Jefferson Jakes

← Conservatives in the Third Dimension
Harry Perkins and the Rest of Us →

RSS Jonathan Haidt

  • Why The Righteous Mind may be the best common reading for incoming college students February 19, 2017 Jonathan Haidt

RSS George Lakoff

RSS Corey Robin

Jacob Jefferson Jakes

The Political Mind

  • View Jacob-Jefferson-Jakes-127488407357719’s profile on Facebook
  • View JacobJJakes’s profile on Twitter
  • View 118350928673473455810’s profile on Google+

Mind&Politics

  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Facebook
  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Twitter
  • View 107647165319384338834’s profile on Google+

Recent Posts

  • The Truth Behind the Curtain: Ken Ham, Antonin Scalia, and Milton Friedman find it February 20, 2017
  • “I Support Trump” July 31, 2016
  • GOP Media Warfare, Hierarchy, and Agriculture November 28, 2015
  • To the Heart of an Idea, Conservative and Liberal October 25, 2015
  • State Sovereignty and Constitutionally-limited Government September 7, 2015
  • “…of the United States…”: Creating a Nation July 27, 2014
  • I Would Not Throw the Fat Man Off the Bridge and onto the Trolley Tracks July 13, 2014
  • Shit Happens and Big Data July 12, 2014
  • Wittgenstein, Identity-Protection Cognition, and Understanding Rather than Persuading June 1, 2014
  • What if Piketty is Right? April 27, 2014

Recent Comments

    Archives

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Categories

    Tags

    1% abortion ACA anti-federalist Avi Tuschman climate change conservatism conservative conservative boredom conservative enthusiasm conservative mind constitution critical thinking Daniel Kahneman David Brooks democracy Edmund Burke federalist federal taxes gay rights George Lakoff hobby lobby income inequality Jonathan Haidt Joshua Greene karma liberal liberal mind moral politics Moral Tribes natural law Newt GIngrich nurturant parent Occupy Wall Street Patrick Allitt racism Steven Pinker strict father strict father model tax policy tax quintiles Tea Party The Lovers Quarrel Thomas Pangle virtue of muddling through

    © 2025 The Political Mind

    Powered by Esplanade Theme by One Designs and WordPress