The Political Mind
The science and psychology of politics
Navigation
  • About
  • Mind&Politics
  • G Scott Blakley
  • I. A. Grea
You are here: Home › Commentary › George Lakoff, Moral Politics, and Work
← Critiquing Commentary on Income Inequality
Democracy, Protests, OWS, and the Tea Party →

George Lakoff, Moral Politics, and Work

November 15, 2011 | Filed under: Commentary and tagged with: elizabeth warren, George Lakoff, moral politics, work exchange, work reward

In his book Moral Politics, George Lakoff presents a short description of Work as viewed from the conservative and the liberal frames of reference. His description reads like a manifesto comparing the Tea Party with OWS.

In the book he describes the conservative view of work as Work Reward metaphor as one where the employer has legitimate authority, the employee is subject to that authority, work is obedience to the employer’s commands, and pay is the reward for that obedience. These imply that obedience is key, that the employer is the superior, and that the employer knows best.

In the Work Exchange metaphor, work is an object of value which the worker possesses; the employer possesses the money, and employment is the voluntary exchange of work for money.

The Work Reward metaphor reminds one so much of the feudal system in the Middle Ages, where the peasants offered work and obedience and the lord offered protection in return. It is easy to see why individuals adhering to the Work Reward metaphor dislike trade unionism and the notion that employees should have some power, which unionism represents. It also explains much of the tone of conservative commentary on OWS, a tone which I mentioned in my critique of one commentary in a post a few days back, that those at the top of the heap, the “1%”, deserve what they have, and deserve obedience to them, since they are the superiors in the relationship with the “99%”.

The Work Reward metaphor also somewhat explains the Elizabeth Warren comment that went semi-viral on Facebook recently, that while the rich should certainly feel free to keep some measure of their gains, they need to remember that it is the working people who created the foundation on which the wealthy make their money, and that there is essentially this contract that the people deserve some of the reward for their labor.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Tweet

Written by Jacob Jefferson Jakes

← Critiquing Commentary on Income Inequality
Democracy, Protests, OWS, and the Tea Party →

RSS Jonathan Haidt

  • Why The Righteous Mind may be the best common reading for incoming college students February 19, 2017 Jonathan Haidt

RSS George Lakoff

RSS Corey Robin

Jacob Jefferson Jakes

The Political Mind

  • View Jacob-Jefferson-Jakes-127488407357719’s profile on Facebook
  • View JacobJJakes’s profile on Twitter
  • View 118350928673473455810’s profile on Google+

Mind&Politics

  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Facebook
  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Twitter
  • View 107647165319384338834’s profile on Google+

Recent Posts

  • The Truth Behind the Curtain: Ken Ham, Antonin Scalia, and Milton Friedman find it February 20, 2017
  • “I Support Trump” July 31, 2016
  • GOP Media Warfare, Hierarchy, and Agriculture November 28, 2015
  • To the Heart of an Idea, Conservative and Liberal October 25, 2015
  • State Sovereignty and Constitutionally-limited Government September 7, 2015
  • “…of the United States…”: Creating a Nation July 27, 2014
  • I Would Not Throw the Fat Man Off the Bridge and onto the Trolley Tracks July 13, 2014
  • Shit Happens and Big Data July 12, 2014
  • Wittgenstein, Identity-Protection Cognition, and Understanding Rather than Persuading June 1, 2014
  • What if Piketty is Right? April 27, 2014

Recent Comments

    Archives

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Categories

    Tags

    1% abortion Adam Smith anti-federalist Articles of Confederation climate change conservatism conservative conservative boredom conservative enthusiasm constitution Daniel Kahneman David Brooks democracy Edmund Burke Elvin Lim federalist federal taxes gay rights George Lakoff hobby lobby income inequality Jonathan Haidt karma liberal libertarians Mitt Romney moral politics natural law neoconservatives Newt GIngrich nurturant parent Occupy Wall Street Patrick Allitt pro-life racism robert reich strict father strict father model tax policy tax quintiles Tea Party The Lovers Quarrel Thomas Pangle virtue of muddling through

    © 2025 The Political Mind

    Powered by Esplanade Theme by One Designs and WordPress